Treehugger rebuts The Economist December 19, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Food, Organic, Protests, fast food, organic farming, organic food, slow food, supermarkets.add a comment
Treehugger: The Economist on the Politics of Food
Treehugger butting back against the Economist, hence more pictures of the couple with the matoes’
English posts that contain Food per day for the last 30 days.
Get your own chart!
The Long Tail – a review November 8, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Research, publishing.1 comment so far
I’ve posted my review of the Long Tail here,
Another Organic Inc Review October 30, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Organic, organic farming, organic food.add a comment
Found this review of Organic Inc interesting. I was impressed by the way GroovyGreen also flagged up how to purchase the book supporting either the blog or the publisher.
Creative Commons and Unbounded Freedom September 29, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Organic, publishing.add a comment
I’m just starting on a pamphlet from Counterpoint a cultural think tank about copyright and publishing. They have just released the booklet called Unbounded Freedom, which is yes you guessed it, free to download.
The United States of Gourmets ? September 20, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Food, Organic, organic food, slow food, supermarkets.add a comment
An interesting article at Salon.com, which reflects themes developed in organic.inc.
Are we really turning into Gourmet nations, or perhaps it is part of re-claiming a lost food culture. I’ll try to review the book as soon as I get a copy.
Organic Inc, – Review September 11, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Organic, Research, organic farming, organic food.3 comments
Okay, I was going to write a commentary but to be fair a review would also be useful. The first thing to say about this book, is that like the proverbial duck, it is paddling hard beneath the surface whilst looking graceful on top, Fromartz has done the work – spoken to most of the key players, read the research – both academic and commercial. The result is that it reads well but has a serious punch.
If you don’t want to wade through my comments jump straight to these pages to read extracts and even order it up.
The axis around which the book is organised is that the organic movement in the US is in a conflict between those who desire a purity that would forbid the huge growth that has characterised organic farming and food in the last few years, and those who like it as it is. Of course this is expressed in litigation, as in the case of Arthur Harvey representing himself in an attack on the right to label many organic goods as organic. Rather than stemming from a pro-pesticide, far-right lobby group this attack came from within the movement – Harvey is a small scale organic blueberry grower. This dispute and the energy it has unleashed about what organic means is the core conflict in the contemporary US organic movement. Fromartz is a reliable guide to this conflict, charting his own journey from Whole Food regular to Farmers’ Markets and growing his own vegetables, whilst having interviewed all of the key actors in this dispute.
He charts this through the strawberry trade in California, local sales , organic salad in the catering trade and how that let to huge organic businesses, the development of breakfast cereals and the inevitable backlash, concluding with a consideration of why people buy organic in the first place. Although there are endnotes, and it does look to quite sophisticated arguments, this book is so skillfully written that you do absorb it easily and move with the discussion. Some sections felt familiar to me, as I have read the source material – say the debate on Strawberries in California but the discussion of Soya production genuinely shocked me as a hardened reader of food industry practices.
The best is however saved to last, the chapter on ‘why we buy’ is outstanding. Fromartz takes the dichtomy between whether you could ever have an organic Twinkie and subjects that discussion to the hard light of what consumers actually do. This for me is one the central observations of the whole book, that the debate in the organic movement is actually intensely ideological to the extent that it often overlooks the evidence. People buy and use organic food in complex ways, the ideas of the ideologically charged do not reach into people’s kitchens and pantrys. Until the organic movement looks at organic consumption as it actually is, rather than what it projects it to be, then the impasse can never be overcome.
Fromartz is more content with the organic movement than I would be, but I’m not concerned with that, it is the journey that I hold to be interesting, well written and important. Unfortunately, for those who are not familiar with US eating and farming, much of this will be hard to digest. So many of the points being made are very specific to the States, they don’t travel well – including the title. In Europe ‘Natural Foods’ are quite different and not related in the same way to organics as they are in the US, making what is a good pun a little confusing.
So if you haven’t opened another browser window to either read the extracts or order it – do so now.
The best so far – Organic, Inc – Fromartz September 6, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Food, Organic, environmentalism, organic farming, organic food, slow food.add a comment
I’ve just finished ready Samuel Fromartz’s Organic, Inc – Natural Foods and How They Grew, which for my money is the best non-academic book on organic food and farming I’ve yet read.
Rather than write a review, of which there will be many, I’m going to write a commentary, as I need to create notes about it. But if you are looking at the shelf wondering what to read or if you know about organic food and farming and want a book that will prime others, get this one.
The Book ain’t broke September 1, 2006
Posted by organicresearcher in Books, Organic, Research, environmentalism.1 comment so far
Over the past few days I’ve been having a interesting debate with Eoin Purcell over the virtues of the latest self-publishing innovations. In a comment Eoin mentioned the ideas that maybe the form of print is out of date, which got me thinking.
As the effort towards the $100 dollar laptop (see this Wired article) has helped frame my thoughts on this topic. The project takes back the original project of the PC, which at least for some people was about giving this set of amazing new techologies to the people (see for example the Homebrew club). Recently it would seem a lot of PC production has become about selling gaming and entertainment, as this is a great way of constantly ramping up the spec of a basic machine. The good by-product of this is that a basic machine is getting increasingly powerful – and cheaper. Most of us now have more computing power than we can actually use. By asking the question about the $100 laptop there is a discussion as to what the basic premises of the PC should be about.
Blurb.com, Lulu and iUniverse to a lesser degree allow us to do the same thing about the book and other printed forms. What is the book for?
With the advent of the Web 1.0 those with a connection and a PC got to publish whatever they wanted, you can leave your opus dangling as a free download in Word or PDF format and it will travel if people are interested. It is a little like throwing a message in a bottle into the ocean, but you can put your views out there and people have. That is the great success of the web.
Books have in many ways become much more important in such times. Firstly as a form of technology is just works – it is user-friendly, needs relatively little training to use, is robust, so cheap that it is nearly ubiquitous, and importantly could be quite easily be made to be sustainably produced. It is also as a technology very hard to squeeze any new profit out of, a Microsoft analogue isn’t going to take it over, it cannot be constantly be ramped up in terms of cost and performance. Finally it is isn’t going to be redundant anytime soon, a well stored book will last for hundreds of years and will still work. The huge libraries scattered around the world testify to this.
The most important quality of the book in this time is that it is slow. Blogs, webchats, talkshows, newspaper articles are necessary and ephemeral, as we say on this side of the Atlantic they are tomorrow’s chip wrapping. Books are by necessity slow to compile, they have to worked through and thought out. A badly organised, poorly thought through book is hard to read and hard to use. The most important aspect of the book is it’s content and it access to being able to provide that content that is the essential change that we need to bring about. The slowness of creation is reflected in its durability, some things need to be said and their importance entrusted to something that will persist so that others can access it when, and if, they need to.
Because the book is cheap, it should be easy for people to access and a little like the open source software movement, we need to see networks of editors, proof-readers, discussants and critics to help this effort work. We need cheap books because people want to record their ideas and experiences and they want to communicate those to others. As traditional communities decline, as we relate to each other in new forms and through different means, the book can serve as a baseline way of recording and communicating our lives, ideas and dreams.
